Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diss tape

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT. dbenbenn | talk 19:04, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Diss tape

About hip hop rivalries, on which we already have a nice, long article. The term isn't a proper nor used one, the one sentence of information included is already present in the hip hop ricalries article, so I think it should be deleted with nno redirect; no need to merge (the only page it linked with is Murder Inc. Records, which I have already relinked to the proper article....on second thought, redirect.--b. Touch 23:41, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• 244 web hits, many not Wikipedia mirrors; just one relevant Usenet hit (murder inc diss tape). I would redirect - if nothing else, it would discourage re-creation of an article here... Samaritan 00:25, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable enough, article as it stands in un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 01:50, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect Jeshii 02:33, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as per B Touch. JoaoRicardo 03:04, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Er ... B Touch voted "delete with no redirect". Uncle G 15:55, 2005 Feb 7 (UTC)
    • Redirect to hip hop rivalries. Nothing to merge, but this may be a common search term. Thanks, Uncle G. JoaoRicardo 19:36, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per B Touch. Uncle G 15:55, 2005 Feb 7 (UTC)
  • The common search term argument is persuasive. Redirect as per JoaoRicardo. Uncle G 03:22, 2005 Feb 8 (UTC)
• Redirect. -Sean Curtin 03:08, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.