Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disrobics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disrobics

Disrobics (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

No reliable sources, and I'm not sure it even asserts notability as required by WP:CSD ViperSnake151 19:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete It doesn't meet WP:CSD because that's only for non-notable persons, organizations, etc. But yes, this should be deleted per WP:N because it fails notability. Gary King (talk) 23:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for lack of significant coverage in reliable, secondary source material. VanTucky 05:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. The only source here is the clip itself; thus much of the assertions in the articles would be original research. There's nothing in the article to indicate why it is to be kept here except that it's an "internet meme," but without standards, anything on Myspace and Facebook could be called that. B.Wind (talk) 05:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.