Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discrimination against non-Muslims in Afghanistan

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was

[edit] Discrimination against non-Muslims in Afghanistan

For reasons see: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Discrimination against non-Muslims in Iran. Copy and past of US State Department report. The title is POV and the source (US government on Islamic country) is not neutral OneGuy 21:13, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete How many non-muslims are there any way? Plus Taliban are gone and there is US back goverment Zain 01:03, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete POV title ... and would we post on Wikipedia Iranian government report on Israel or the US? OneGuy 02:22, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• vote do not delete--Malbear 06:00, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Big POV. This is US state communication material: it is not an attempt at fairly reporting on the subject. It is fundamentaly biased for it is the expression of a country 1) at war 2) christian. Also, there is no point in blandly duplicating this material. IMO it's worth a link but not duplication in WE. Gtabary 11:42, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge or move. The US State Department reports are generally a credible source, and are public domain, but the article title isn't NPOV, and there is no need to duplicate large portions of the report — that's better left to Wikisource. Put what is useful into articles with more NPOV titles, leave the rest. Shimeru 21:49, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, this is an historical warning without context, not encyclopedic. Wyss 22:04, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to appropriate articles and move report to wikisource Pedant 22:11, 2005 Jan 14 (UTC)
• Delete. --Conti|✉ 03:06, Jan 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Well, the information in the article is certainly notable (perticularly the destruction of the Bhudda statues in 2001). I'm in favor of merging. Deleting is not the solution here. --L33tminion | (talk) 06:35, Jan 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. Jayjg | (Talk) 02:36, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. Megan1967 01:34, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. Carrp 23:36, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.