Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discreetlondon

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was RESULT. Woohookitty 11:26, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

I'm assuming Woohookitty meant to say the result was DELETE, which appears to have been done. moink 04:41, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Discreetlondon

Non-notable (7 uniques hits on Google) Demogorgon's Soup-taster 09:41, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete all whiny blogs.
• Delete all blogs. Proto t c 10:05, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all blogs -realwingus 10:05, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete—Encephalon | ^ζ  10:21:57, 2005-09-01 (UTC)
• Delete Red Dalek 11:47, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Don't delete all blogs, but set the bar very high. The exploits of one adulterous man aren't particularly notable, no matter what medium they're recorded in. android79 12:06, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DV8 2XL 14:01, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Below votes all cast by 132.185.144.122

• KEEP! I like it. wikiwild 15:17, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• It's a winner, don't delete!! This guy can write and it's about to be a book hangman 18:43, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• It's a great blog Let it stay! kimmyG 00:21, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Don't delete! It's better than you think megaman 01:36, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• It's a keeper! Those Brits know how to write! KingGeorge 01:42, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Please don't delete! I like discreetlondon! Yakitori 02:27, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.