The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete per above. Interesting read, but without decent attribution it needs to be chucked. Groupthink 07:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete - appears to be original research. I would want to see some valid references to reconsider. Turlo Lomon 08:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.