Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disaster tourism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. -- BD2412 ^talk 05:32, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Disaster tourism

Neologism which generates a very low amount of relevant Google hits. Delete. --Sn0wflake 2 July 2005 18:21 (UTC)

• Keep; in principle it's a legitimate article. jamesgibbon 2 July 2005 22:54 (UTC)
• Keep;certainly needs expansion, but I would like to read the finished result, especially if examples or scholarly conclusions about the phenomenom can be incorporated. DavidH July 3, 2005 00:00 (UTC)
• Keep added {{expand}} tag, needs definite expansion but should be kept. Jtkiefer July 3, 2005 05:14 (UTC)
• Keep. This tourism definitely exists. But this article is very vague. -newkai | talk | contribs July 3, 2005 18:38 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a real problem in disaster relief. This has been known to happen in the Southern U.S. with some people driving in right after a hurricane to see the aftermath.--Pharos 4 July 2005 04:53 (UTC)
  • Comment: Most google hits seem to be about the aftermath of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, especially in India, Sri Lanka and Thailand.--Pharos 4 July 2005 16:45 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.