Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappointment (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 14:49, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disappointment

Disappointment (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Dicdef, can't be anything more than OR. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 16:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

• Transwiki to Wiktionary. I think this would be better suited there, than in an encyclopedia. Useight 17:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and transwiki as dicdef. Tx17777 17:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete According to the late Jackie Wilson, disappointment was a guy. But then, you came, and he soon departed. And, you know? He never showed his face again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandsford (talk • contribs) 19:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and above. Has only one site, and one example. Not likely to be much more. Bearian 16:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Dictionary material. Dean Wormer 04:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.