Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dis-Harmony / Collect All 5! / Ninjcompoop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. There are no binding decisions on Wikipedia, much less binding precedents, so the argument that Hi Hi should have articles on every episode because other TV series do does not stand up. 'Merge and delete' is not possible per the GFDL, and even if it was, List of Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi episodes is just a list, and does not allow for episode guides at present. Though that list is apprently undergoing rewriting, and I will retrieve the deleted content of this article on request if it is needed for that purpose. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 23:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dis-Harmony / Collect All 5! / Ninjcompoop

We do not need a Wikipedia article for each episode. It is totally unnecessary. Wiki is for the general concept of stuff. DarkAdonis255 21:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. (Liberatore, 2006). 12:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Merge to List of Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi episodes then Delete. Not a notable enough TV show to warrant dozens of entries detailing every episode. --DaveG12345 22:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep TV show episodes. The TV show is very notable. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge then Delete as nom. Jeff huh? Individual episodes of TV shows such as this get individual encyclopedia entries? --Amists 12:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • In many cases, yes, and we've been woefully inconsistent about it. --12:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • To be fair, in many cases also no, and there's no "consistency" because there is no policy on this whatsoever, each case stands or falls on its own merits. As it should be. :-) --DaveG12345 17:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Well, the lack of a policy adds to the lack of consistency, but when people are calling this show "not notable enough," I'm not sure merits are what's governing the decision. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• With all due respect, the lack of a policy could have been mentioned in your first comment, but it was not. I was merely ensuring no one went away with the wrong impression re policy. --DaveG12345 00:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unless there's a way to cleanly add the info to the list. There's no real justification for individual episode articles of this. Surely there must be a wiki that deals with animated minutiae? GassyGuy 20:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.