Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct metal deposition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neıl ☎ 14:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Direct metal deposition

Direct metal deposition (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Appears to be a transcription of an advertising brochure. The topic may merit coverage but this form seems inappropriate. Retarius | Talk 03:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment: Think this ought to be Redirected as per policy on things to consider before AfD. Have left a comment to this effect on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Engineering#Issues_of_ongoing_concern as they are better position to tackle this. It is an important technique.--Aspro (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Perhaps a fine idea, but could you just submit an opinion of “Redirect to ____”, where you provide a specific article to which you believe that redirection would be appropriate? —SlamDiego←T 02:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: As I remarked on the Project Endineering page: This is a registered trade mark, so really ought, I think, be redirected to Selective laser sintering to help readers who search on either 'DMD' or Direct metal deposition . The technique it depends on however is call Direct laser powder deposition and I don't seem to be able to find that. So maybe that needs a mention. I am out of date on this technology. In my day, we had to make do with spaying metal or carbides through a hot plasma arc. This is an important technique of adding material to where one need it. I haven't voted here since wiki-lawers like to point out that AfD's nominations shouldn't be applied until after a 'Redirect' has been at least considered as one of the options -which they tell me is clearly stated in black and white somewhere in the AfD policy. Here in an document prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy on the method. [1] --Aspro (talk) 12:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Well, old-timer, I at least appreciate your comments. But I'm not even a has-been when it comes to this stuff. —SlamDiego←T 04:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.