Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct-deliberative e-democracy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid64 19:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Direct-deliberative e-democracy

Apparently non-notable book. Would likely fail proposed Wikipedia:Notability (books) and page appears to have been created by one of the book's authors. --Dgies 04:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Looks like extremely non-notable book. No way to tell if author is trying to promote his book or his political theories, but either way, this is not the place for it. Fan-1967 05:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Google searches do not seem to establish this as a theory apart from its author, who also wrote the WP article. (But then, see Talk:Democracy & Nature for an example of me being on the losing side of a similar subject.) --SarekOfVulcan 05:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Kf4bdy ^{talk contribs} 23:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It can only benefit the wiki community to have some access to this set of concepts right now. i have been creating some categorizations to make this more systematic and hopefully more helpful. i would like to see this article remain here for the timne being. thanks. --Sm8900 22:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • But how is this book notable? It is harmful to the encyclopedia if it is cluttered up with a lot of forgettable books and pet theories. --Dgies 02:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.