Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diplomatic missions of Romania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPeedy close. This nomination is clearly premature, parties are encouraged to edit the article and see if it can be made encyclopaedic, with due consideration to things Wikipedia is not. Guy (Help!) 15:23, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Diplomatic missions of Romania

Diplomatic missions of Romania (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Completely useless, unnecessary and uncategorised pile of original research. It can't possibly get any better. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 14:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep: Not at all. See the other 100 articles ({{Europe_in_topic|Diplomatic missions of}}).--Sambure (talk) 14:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: Off-topic discussion moved here.--Stephan Schulz (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Neutral: hold for now since the article was tagged 2 mins ater the creation, by thich the creator had made an edit =>the creator might have been thinking of expanding itNergaal (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand with reliable sources. There are a lot of other diplomatic mission for other countries. And rewrite into textual article instead of listing like the current one, unless this is a list article. Dekisugi (talk) 14:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - it's one of the articles in a companion series to country articles, like "History of..." or "Politics of...". Zocky | picture popups 14:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep for now, but it needs reliable sources.--Michig (talk) 14:59, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand, per Dekisugi Tonywalton  | Talk 15:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.