Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diogradroalisis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY NONSENSE --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 05:56, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Diogradroalisis

Hoax. "...THIS HAS BEEN TESTED MULTIPLE TIMES other than this site and my laptop computer are the only things that hold this data and a few other things that the military would have a feild day with..." Prashanthns 04:30, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I added the nonsense template, but in case it doesn't get speedied, I'm voting to delete. TheRingess 04:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per TheRingess -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 05:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete- patent nonsense. Reyk 05:49, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per Reyk. --Aaron 05:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.