Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinowhip

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk July 3, 2005 21:45 (UTC)

[edit] Dinowhip

Only comes up with one google hit [1] and that page is an add for a company with an email address of dinowhip1@***.com which incidentally is the user ID of the creator. Given that, seems like a form of neologism to me. Although I could see it being merged with bullwhip, I'd have to say delete for now. Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 02:14, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Term does not appear to be widely used. Pburka 02:20, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The original version of this article was speedied. Given the almost complete absence of Googlability I'd have to say delete as unverifiable, possible nonsense, even though the link in the article appears to be a site dating from 2000 which, if true, would mean it wasn't a neologism. Must write in shorter sentences. -Splash 02:23, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ^ditto that all^ Redwolf24 06:25, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ^^^ -Eisnel 09:47, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, dinocruft. ComCat 30 June 2005 19:23 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.