Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinohunters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Fuhghettaboutit 10:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dinohunters

Dinohunters (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Very little assertion of notability. Judging by edit history of article creator and maintainers, they work for the company behind the game. Sources largely trivial. Drat (Talk) 09:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of machinima deletions. Drat (Talk) 09:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• keep per g-hits include numerous game reviews. i believe notability is asserted with being a pioneer of advergaming. not that it matters, but after several reads today, this article actually seems well put together ;) the_undertow ^talk 00:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 01:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep. Article is appropriate for an encyclopedia, reasonably sourced and fairly well written. Notability needs to be more strongly asserted, and probably could be. =Axlq 06:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep A notable game, however the article is in need of sources that are not affiliated with the company that produced the game. I'm sure some information could be dug up at IGN or GameSpot in order to provide some reliable secondary sources. --Cyrus Andiron 13:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.