Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimensional Fund Advisors

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:39, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dimensional Fund Advisors

Tagged for speedy as advertising. Not a speedy candidate IMO. 17,300 google hits. [1]. Kappa 22:31, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

• Weak Keep: Although Kappa has bit slap'd me for speedying stuff, this isn't one of them. They are a large firm, noted on Morningstar, and have been around for a while. I'd rather it didn't read like an ad or something from a press release, but don't know it well enough to fix it. Wikibofh 23:13, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oh oops, I forgot to explain which speedy tag of yours I didn't like... it was just the one. Kappa 00:43, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.