Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dillon doyle

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. JeremyA 04:09, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dillon doyle

Blatant vanity is not (unfortunately) a criterion for speedy delete, so here we are. He's a "pretty good" student and does "alright" in chemistry. Please applaud, then delete. Denni☯ 01:49, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)

• applauds, Delete. NeoJustin 02:42 June 3, 2004
• Delete, vanity. --bainer (talk) 03:03, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- Spelling. Is spelling a criterion? Vanity then. --Tysto 03:22, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 09:23, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all vanity. Mgm|^(talk) 11:34, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete high school vanity. --Etacar11 15:32, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - His arch enamy (sic) seems to be the English language, not French. OnwardToGolgotha 15:57, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. That's right, every award!!!!11one 216.158.31.195 17:18, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Unlike others I do not see any spelling errors. I also don't think this is vanity. It is clearly an artical about a vital piece of SLP history!!!
  • (unsigned comment by Dmoney45 who has previously vandalized and blanked this page --Etacar11 04:00, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC))

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.