Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dillon Collier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 17:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dillon Collier

Does not seems to be notable enough. The page was nominated for speedy as a nn-bio. I think it should go to AfD instead. I am personally vote Neutral for now abakharev 09:48, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Non-notable sportscaster, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat 10:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. A few online mentions, but not enough to establish notability to warrant an article (must be noted that an online search reveals that most hits come from WP's entry for KGNS-TV, where he has been mentioned undisputedly since April 1 tho). Phædriel ♥ tell me - 12:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Lockitdown is vandalizing this AfD. Recommend a block. --Coredesat 20:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Based on internet research, Collier is considered a significant public figure in Laredo and much of Southwest Texas. I vote to keep the article for now and see if further contributions are made to it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lockitdown (talk • contribs)
    • User:Lockitdown put the above message (presumally accidentally) in the middle of my comment and was reverted. abakharev 22:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable, gets a mention on WP's KGNS-TV article and, for someone a year into their first journalism job, that seems about right. --DaveG12345 00:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete No reason for a local weekend sportscaster to have an encyclopedia article. --NMChico24 02:03, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.