Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  08:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Digital magazine

Link farm. Wikipedia is not free advertising and not a random collection of links. :) Dlohcierekim 18:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and clean up. According to Zinio, magazines distributed this way include Playboy, Womans Day, Harvard Business Review, and that eminent children's magazine on economic matters, BusinessWeek. Gazpacho 18:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete A paper route is a means of distributing notable newspapers. That doesn't make it notable by association. --Xrblsnggt 03:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • This is a technology used by several major industry players. What other significance criteria for technology is there? (PS: paperboy) Gazpacho 17:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• Expand. Subject is encyclopedic, but current version is sub-par. Han-Kwang 23:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as dicdef. It otherwise becomes a list of "industry players", which belies the subject's own importance. Tychocat 09:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  15:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Redlinks removed. Gazpacho 17:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There's little to say other than a definition of the term. —Michael Hays 17:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.