Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital double
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn after article rewritten. W.marsh 21:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Digital double
Note: Page moved to Virtual human
This page has multiple issues and was tagged to be a hoax twice. It is an article for something that is projected to happen in 2017 and so that is crystal balling for something 9 years in the future. Tavix (talk) 02:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete: article is likely WP:HOAX and violates Wikipedia is not a cyrstal ball. Mh29255 (talk) 02:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. While there could be an article at this title, what is currently there doesn't seem anywhere close. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Uncle G's total rewrite. Zetawoof(ζ) 10:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Zetawoof, reason for deletion is now invalid.--Lenticel (talk) 14:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per name-change and rewrite, now reads much better. And kudos to User:Uncle G for his constant article fixing. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 14:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. This should no longer be considered for deletion at this point, we are talking about a completely different article that has been rewritten. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 19:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Withdrawn nomination. This article has recieve a total remake since I nominated to the point where it almost a completely different article. Tavix (talk) 18:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
