Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital-analog clock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge with Digital clock to Digital clock#Digital-analogue clock. anthony^[cfc] 19:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Digital-analog clock

Digital-analog clock (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Orphaned page, contains no useful information and would appear to be impossible to expand into anything useful Iridescenti 20:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

• Merge any useful content to digital clock under a "variants" section - it's not an obscure timepiece by any means. Any original research and patently untrue stuff needs to be removed though - I had a watch like this once and it certainly wasn't a "more expensive" model - it cost me all of £2. No redirect, as there doesn't seem to be a standard name for this kind of clock/watch, and could equally apply to a timepiece which has both an analogue dial and a digital display together (which are, if anything, far more common than this kind of timepiece). ~Matticus ^T_C 00:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • If you're going to merge, you need the redirect in order to preserve the edit history. FrozenPurpleCube 00:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 19:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

• Merge & redirect to Digital clock. - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 19:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.