Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digimon RPG
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Whispering(talk/c) 17:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Digimon RPG
Delete non-notable fan-created RPG about Digimon. Prod challenged by the article's author, who has no other edits other than the article itself. Article contains no sources whatsoever, not even a link to a website about the game. -- Ned Scott 03:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Article contains an image of the "logo" of this game. If the article is deleted then Image:Digimonrpglogo.gif probably should as well. -- Ned Scott 04:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable fan game. TJ Spyke 04:02, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete I'm sure somebody worked really hard on this game, but it's neither official nor significant.Never mind! ObtuseAngle 14:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)- Undecided, possible hoax. Article asserts Bandai as the producer. A Google search comes up with this page [1], Google's Korean translation is crap, but the site shows the logo used in the Infobox, and clearly dislays a Bandai logo at the bottom. Desprately needs a {{user ko}} editor to help fact check. --Roninbk t c e # 04:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, crap, now I'm not so sure. -- Ned Scott 05:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Ooo66 05:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, the game is defintely not fan made.
- here is the game's entry on the universal video game's list. The information on there supports the article (i.e. published by Bandai, developed by Digitalic.)
- here is the official Digitalic website. Even if you can't understand the writing, notice the link on the bottom left corner to their family site, which is the logo for the Digimon RPG
- here is the actual digimon RPG site
- The game is completely korean, and seems to be faily popular in the korean community too. Whether it's considered 'notable' on an english wiki is another matter. There is an [z9.invisionfree.com/digimonrpgonline/index.php? english fan community] for it, where an english patch is also under development. Does this make it worth keeping?--Yaksha 07:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, we are English as in the language of text we use, not in the topics we cover. I retract my delete. -- Ned Scott 07:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- So that means this article isn't nominated for deletion anymore? --Yaksha 07:43, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Technically speaking I can't close the AfD myself via retraction since two other editors also moved for a delete. However, an admin might choose to speedy keep based on the discussion so far. That being said, I might as well say speedy keep. -- Ned Scott 09:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is a discussion. Try communicating with the editors concerned, to see whether you can change their minds based upon whatever evidence you now have to present. Ask them to revisit the discussion. Uncle G 11:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Consider my vote changed to Keep. ObtuseAngle 14:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Technically speaking I can't close the AfD myself via retraction since two other editors also moved for a delete. However, an admin might choose to speedy keep based on the discussion so far. That being said, I might as well say speedy keep. -- Ned Scott 09:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- So that means this article isn't nominated for deletion anymore? --Yaksha 07:43, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, we are English as in the language of text we use, not in the topics we cover. I retract my delete. -- Ned Scott 07:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Per Yaksha's links, and a good time was had by all. QuagmireDog 16:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.