Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DiggFans
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 23:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DiggFans
I thought this was afd'd already.... anyway the article says it all "around 250 members and over 1000 posts" (does not meet WP:WEB for the pedantic :))
- Delete WhiteNight T | @ | C 01:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete You gotta be kidding me... someone thought that forum was worth an article?→ P.MacUidhir (t) (c) 09:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm not too offended by the page at all Eddie 10:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, this kind of stuff should be speedyable. It even has a hint of self-promotion, "the forum to watch in 2006"?! —Locke Cole • t • c 11:01, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable webforum, POV reportage at any rate. Hamster Sandwich 11:11, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and this should be speedy-able. Think this counts as a club? --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 11:13, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete webspam--MONGO 11:54, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Per WP:WEB ComputerJoe 20:51, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable and appears to be an advertisement. Ajwebb 22:13, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm closing this. I can't believe we have to have a vote in order to delete such obvious cruft. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 23:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
