Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DigHayZoose

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-08 22:08Z

[edit] DigHayZoose

DigHayZoose (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable music group. Google search returns only 1,690 hits. Candy-Panda 12:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, WP:MUSIC. Terence Ong 13:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Please note, that they Pass WP:MUSIC so this argument is invalidated. —siroχo 09:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Note, when using the "Google Test" and other such techniques (especially in entertainment-related articles), that results will be skewed toward the modern era, post 1997-ish. This band released three albums before disbanding, from 1991 until 1995. Thus coverage on the internet would be minimal compared to any modern band. The "Google Test" and similar methods cannot effectively speak to the notability for inclusion in Wikipedia. Dan, the CowMan 01:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
    • This article in now referenced. Dan, the CowMan 21:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, they actually pass WP:MUSIC, with three releases under Word Records —siroχo 09:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Passes WP:BAND. ShadowHalo 03:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark 12:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Being signed meets WP:MUSIC as stated above. Ccscott 16:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, passes WP:MUSIC. --Dhartung | Talk 20:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • keep please signed and meets music guideline now yuckfoo 21:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Do I vote again on a relist, or does my previous vote still stand? Dan, the CowMan 21:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.