Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Didsbury Women's Circle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was BJAODN and DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:31, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Didsbury Women's Circle

Almost certainly a hoax. If not then Non-notable Rich Farmbrough 23:25, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

delete If hoax move to BJAODN otherwise move to Tewkesbury Women's Circle as a hoax, then delete that and move to BJAODN. Rich Farmbrough 23:25, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

• Strange, but their alleged webpage says "File not found because the user does not exist". In German. How odd. It does seem from the history that this article has been rattling around since February with various editors including 81.157.133.244 whose only other significant contributions appear to be improvements to the Liz Blackman article - a Labour MP. How odd, again. Delete as non-notable at least. Tonywalton  | Talk 00:43, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as some or all of above - odd! Dlyons493 Talk 03:58, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Pretty sure it's a hoax (but one of the better ones, so a BJAODN candidate). --A bit iffy 10:19, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.