Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diditleak.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete — Caknuck (talk) 06:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Diditleak.com

Diditleak.com (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable site (or blog), the references in the article do not mention the site at all. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 01:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete No independent coverage; a whopping 116 Ghits for a website is pretty convincing evidence that it's not notable at this time. Maralia (talk) 04:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete sheesh. JJL (talk) 05:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 07:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. Any need for discussion? Here's a topic: "Not no table" vs. "No va", discuss. - Mdbrownmsw (talk) 18:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.