Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dickson Hill, Ontario

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus, default to keep. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dickson Hill, Ontario

Dickson Hill, Ontario (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Violates WP:LOCAL and WP:CRYRSTAL, it's a page for a suburb that doesn't exist yet. Static Universe 05:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC) Static Universe 05:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Every Buttfuck, Indiana has an article, so should every Assbackwards, Ontario. Size of city/village/whatever is not a criterion for deletion, per the US census article makin' bot precendent. WilyD 15:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Population centers are inherently notable. Caknuck 16:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep all population centers. — brighterorange (talk) 19:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - although every population centre is considered notable by policy, Dickson Hill is not a population centre. As stated in the article, is part of Markham, Ontario which is the notable population centre. That municipality grew and absorbed older towns and villages, but Dickson Hill is not one of them as listed on Markham, Ontario#Markham's neighbourhoods and communities. It is just a named neighbourhood within the municipality. -- Whpq 19:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --SunStar Nettalk 19:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
    • That policy doesn't actually say anything relevent to this article. Care to elaborate? WilyD 21:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep iff proper sourcing can be provided prior to the conclusion of this debate. Yamaguchi先生 03:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Like others have said, population centers are inherently notable. Inserted this reference verifying what's currently in the article and then some [1]. It appears to be an historic area. --Oakshade 09:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Oh my. Rather distinctive name. Whow would've thought? But still, per Ymaguchi, with verification this is a solid keep. --Oakshade 17:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.