Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Parker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Canley (talk) 01:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dick Parker

Dick Parker (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

The book exists but the publisher is a vanity press. I find no coverage other than a calendar listing and no evidence this author passes WP:BIO Travellingcari (talk) 03:25, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Article could have been speedied; it doesn't even make a claim of notability. Jfire (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Michael White^T·C 18:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom, could have also used CSD A7. --Veritas (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)d

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.