Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick's Creek Baptist Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:32, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dick's Creek Baptist Church

Non-notable Church in non-notable town. Nothing links to it, no outgoing links. Pointless article Bobbis 20:55, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Merge to Jackson County, North Carolina Barely relevant on its own, but perhaps it would be useful in its county's article -- RussellG 09:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, just as important to have every church that ever existed as it is to have every school that ever existed. RickK 22:04, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Observation: fails google test. Ambush Commander 23:04, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per RickK. I got this one hit (with Yahoo): [1] so it does seem to exist. Kappa 23:58, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, 102 year-old churchs are significant enough, let's have more. --Zero 00:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete for the same reason RickK says keep. (I.e., it isn't that important.) --Xcali 04:00, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete notability not established. JamesBurns 06:14, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge and Delete. There's plenty of room at Jackson County, North Carolina for this blurb, if the building or congregation are at all notable. (Note to RickK, The sarcastic use of converse accident is an unconvincing deductive fallacy and seems to be backfiring.) Dystopos 23:36, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep democracys 00:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • User ID created in November of 2003, only one edit until today, all edits today to VfD pages. RickK 04:55, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge to Jackson County, North Carolina (leaving the requisite redirect, of course). -- Jonel | Speak 03:25, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Radiant_>|< 10:02, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Rick's comments. --Centauri 04:33, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, doesn't indicate notability. Gazpacho 02:36, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, churches are generally notable (especially 100+ year old ones), wikipedia is not paper, etc etc etc . . . - Jersyko talk 14:46, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. I agree with Jersyko. -- Zantastik talk 22:54, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.