Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diaper Dandy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Already merged and redirected. Non-admin closure per WP:DPR. Serpent's Choice 08:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Diaper Dandy

Diaper Dandy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Neologism coined by Dick Vitale. All relevant material is already in the Vitale article. Article history shows 3 human edits total. YechielMan 03:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - redirect to Dick Vitale (I actually came to this article intending to put this redirect too!). We won't get any more information than what is already presented in this article. -- Ash Lux ^{(talk | contribs)} 03:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Dick Vitale. The term is not notable enough just because it was invented by someone notable. JIP | Talk 07:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect - I remember the term, I just can never remember who coined it. Well, couldn't; I will now. Anyway, it isn't notable (or substantial) enough for its own article, but I know it had enough permiance(sp?) throughout mainstream society at the time that I should be mentioned in the Dick Vitale article. Since the term might be searched for, we should keep it as a redirect; they're cheap anyway, no harm in having another redirect. -- Y|yukichigai (_ramble argue ^check) 18:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Redirected definition of neologism to Dick Vitale per WP:BOLD. Ohconfucius 02:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.