Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Marchant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 15:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Diane Marchant

• Delete. Star Trek fancruft. — WCityMike ^(T | C)  ⇓ plz reply HERE  (why?) ⇓  02:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Completely non-notable. Erik the Rude 03:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Tychocat 07:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. -- GWO
• Delete, RIP Diane, but not notable enough for a Wikipedia article I'm afraid. - Motor (talk) 10:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Kirk/Spock. SJennings 14:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fancruft, nn. --Terence Ong 16:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, might be worth a mention in Kirk/Spock though —Mets501^talk 17:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Kirk/Spock. (Sorry, Diane, but WP:NOT a memorial.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 18:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per User:Motor; and "passed away" makes me think this appeared somewhere else first. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 22:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Author of a fan fic. The fan fic could potentially be barely notable, the author isn't. Kevin_b_er 03:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable fanfic author. JIP | Talk 14:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.