Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Linkletter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 13:35, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Diane Linkletter

Linkletter Diane...Fact, the same man who was with Linkletter when she "Jumped" was later with Carol Wayne, of the Johnny Carson show, when she died of mysterious circumstances in Mexico. Doesn't seem to be notable in herself, add important info to Art Linkletter. Arniep 11:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, as her death is notable in its controversy. -- Grev 15:37, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Grev and per WP:MUSIC for her participation in Grammy-winning recording. --Metropolitan90 17:04, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Nomination seems to be part of a campaign to delete category:Famous people's relatives who committed suicide by emptying the category.--Mike Selinker 19:53, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

I nominated these as various other articles of relatives of famous people have been deleted and we need to decide whether just the fact that a person committed suicide but has not done anything really of note during their own life makes them notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Arniep 20:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I would say winning a Grammy is fairly notable. IrishGuy 21:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep The story (false or not) of the "flying LSD girl" is surely an urban legend by now. There's a film about her too (The Diane Linkletter Story) so I think this is a safe keep. --kingboyk 22:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, Grammy winner plus newsworthy suicide puts her safely over the bar. Note this has nothing directly to do with simply being related to a celebrity and also committing suicide. Deizio 23:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

I missed the grammy award, so I agree keep for this. 00:10, 17 April 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arniep (talk • contribs)

• Keep as per most of the above. David Kernow 01:47, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Famous. Herostratus 05:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Kingboyk & others. --Lockley 22:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I guess this has been resolved, but STRONG KEEP. She is not in any way obscure. It was a big news story in the late 60s. Rather notable. Moncrief 04:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.