Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Holquist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Diana Holquist

Failed prod. Non-notable writer. Her first book hasn't even been published yet, so there is no way to know if she'll go on to be notable or not. Icarus 04:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, nn author. Kimchi.sg | talk 05:07, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per WP:BIO.--blue520 09:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - let's wait until it's published please. -- Hirudo 15:32, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above arguments re non notability. Colonel Tom 00:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. First book set to appear from major publisher (Time/Warner) with promotion in progress, in line which regularly reaches audiences well over the 5K audience standard. Wikipedia may not be a crystal ball, but it's not an ostrich with its head in the sand, either. Monicasdude 01:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO and WP:NOT a crystalball. No evidence this author will meet [[WP:BIO].--Isotope23 02:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete crystal balling - author does not yet meet standards.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 02:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Crystalballism. JoshuaZ 02:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as future prediction. Also, article is practically devoid of content; might as well delete it, we're not losing anything. Mangojuice^talk 14:54, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.