Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Seven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Diamond Seven

Verifiable, but reads like a bookseller's ad; unencyclopedic and not of great apparent notability (26 total Google hits, most of which appear to be incidental mentions and this page). Djcartwright 23:58, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete POV ad possibly by publisher or someone involved in the project (creator was User:Ardmoremedia). Also possible copyright violation (see sopyright notice at the bottom of the page and the talk page of the article's creator). Violation of WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:C, WP:VAIN, etc. --Daniel Olsen 00:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Daniel Olsen Hello32020 00:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above; also appears to fail WP:BK, which was my rationale on the original PROD. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. :) Dlohcierekim 19:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:BK (proposed guideline for notability of books) since it is published by a vanity press and has no independent coverage. Pascal.Tesson 16:41, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.