Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devastatin dave

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. — mark ✎ 10:07, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Devastatin dave

Apparently there is some guy who calls himself "Devastatin' Dave - The Turntable Slave" where the external link on that page points, but the rest is extreme nonsense. Note how he was "born as the first test tube baby to an African American couple in 1954", his father was "martyred" in the imaginary "Second Great Anglo-Zanzibar war", his mother had hopes for him to become a "Professor of Advanced Discrete Analytical Multi-variable biphasic topology" (but doesn't every mother?) etc. I nominate to delete.--Pharos 05:56, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. Do not BJAODN, do not collect $200. - Lucky 6.9 06:01, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, obvious hoax. Megan1967 06:14, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, speedy as pranking is fine by me. -- Infrogmation 06:16, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. As fun as it is to look at, I think Pharos's description of it was enough for me to remember this by. Wakuseino 06:55, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Article is nonsense. Maybe I should start calling myself Devastatin' Dave. DaveTheRed 09:36, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• "Krazy Klerk Killer (KKK)"? Definitely a joke. But why couldn't this go in Wikipedia:BJAODN? -- Riffsyphon1024 09:39, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Although funny, Wikipedia is no place for humor. Except for Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense. --Arm
• Delete, unwikified nonsense. - Mailer Diablo 12:29, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Ho ho hoax. Delete. Mgm|^(talk) 15:00, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, but deserves a spot on BJAODN. Ellsworth 16:58, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Ha ha ha. Delete - David Gerard 14:54, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, but also comment: Note that the album exists and is a mini-meme, just because it sucks so much (the cover doesn't help, either). See [1] for a example. A non-patent nonsense article might be okay, but this one's obviously got to go. -- grm_wnr          23:00, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.