Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destiny Bond

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Destiny Bond

See also the entry for Ember (Pokémon)

This is one of more than a hundred specific attacks in Pokémon, comparable to an article about Fire 1, Fire 2, Fire 3, and all the other spells in the Final Fantasy games. While Pokémon is notable as a cultural phenomenon, individual attacks in Pokémon are not encyclopedic material. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 05:23, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

• Comment - There's a year-old precedent relevant to this: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mirror Coat. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 05:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Pokécruft. — JIP | Talk 05:27, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete--DDerby(talk) 07:32, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge somewhere or keep, part of covering the pokemon universe. Kappa 10:12, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge or delete. TheMadBaron 13:29, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• I would love to merge it somewhere but I don't know for the life of me where. Gastly perhaps as the most famous Pokémon to have the attack (as it was on a trading card as well as in the video games)? --Celestianpower ^hab 17:05, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

I'm thinking there should be an article created on Pokemon attacks. Wandering oojah 19:59, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Here we go. Wandering oojah 20:17, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Oh, WikiGod, you must be joking. That list makes me cry. [[User:Premeditated Chaos|User:Premeditated Chaos/Sig]] 23:41, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

I would have suggested this but there are a lot of attacks... --Celestianpower ^hab 17:22, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Good thing we have nearly unlimited space :) Wandering oojah 03:49, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

There's a difference between "Wikipedia is not paper" and "Lists of 300+ entries are A-OK!" - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 08:05, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

That's an argument for splitting up the article into a number of smaller ones, not an argument for deletion. ··gracefool |☺ 22:18, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. Groeck 18:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Sabine's Sunbird 23:17, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, merge, redirect, or otherwise get rid of it. --Carnildo 23:24, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - just make it go AWAY. [[User:Premeditated Chaos|User:Premeditated Chaos/Sig]] 23:41, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. --Apostrophe 23:43, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Tuf-Kat 07:01, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and i placed List of Pokémon attacks on vfd also --Aranda56 05:28, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. As per nomination. Don't you dare merge it. / Peter ^Isotalo 04:51, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete- an entire article devoted to an attack on Pokemon? Why don't we give an article to every joke on Family Guy while we're at it? PRueda29 12:46, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Wasn't someone trying to do that a while back? - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 02:11, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Given that List of Pokémon attacks seems to be headed for a "keep", I think this article should be merged with that one in some way. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:38, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.