The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. JIP | Talk 18:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Possible vanity, definitely nn. Probably Speedy DeleteDeiz 01:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete, unless it can establish notability in a substantial way. It's got under 300 Google results. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
36 results with the "very similar" results omitted --Deiz 02:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Speedy Delete, nn-bio, likely to be vanity. --Terence Ong 13:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.