Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Designer vagina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect and semiprotect - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Designer vagina

Neologism. Article refers to more extensive labiaplasty article which is apparently basically the same thing. Page is also being endlessly vandalised by children. I@n ≡ talk 06:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as nom. -- I@n ≡ talk 06:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Michael 06:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge and Redirect to labiaplasty. SynergeticMaggot 07:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge any valid content, and redirect to labiaplasty, since it seems like a valid search term. Luna Santin 07:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge if possible or just redirect to labiaplasty. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge labiaplasty. --SJK 09:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • REDIRECT -- there is no content to merge as it already exists in target article. -- Whpq 17:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect of Labiaplasty and protect redirect. Ekajati 20:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect as above Martinp23 21:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per above. Alphachimp talk 23:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • merge, redirect and protect the redirection Antares33712 23:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Good point. The existence of the redirect will just see continued vandalism at a different spot. Is the redirect really necessary? -- I@n ≡ talk 04:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy this one 216.141.226.190 12:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect - just a redirect is simply a Keep since it can be undone next day by any editor. BlueValour 04:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.