Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desert Burn Hoodia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 00:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Desert Burn Hoodia

• The name is trademarked and trademarks are not easily granted. For a new industry [hoodia] this entry appears to be of importance. Someone should clean it up but the add should remain. There are no hyperlinks to any promotional site so the entry is clearly not commercial in nature

Looks like a non-notable diet pill. Passes the google test with flying colours (10,000 hits)[1] but I'm not sure if it's just ad spam. Anyhow, it's poorly formatted, so it's up for AFD. If I knew more about it, I might have not, but then again, the original author didn't give us any context. Weak delete. Elle vécut heureusement _{toujours dorénavant} (Be eudaimonic!) 07:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as advertising. Wikipedia already has a comprehnsive article on Hoodia. Movementarian 07:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advertising. Furthermore, the last two paragraphs of Hoodia look like ad copy from the same source (although not the same editor). Snurks ^{T C} 07:50, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per Movementarian Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:26, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertising. Notice the creator of the article has "Hoodia" in his user name and he vandalized Bruce Lee to promote the product. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 13:41, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.