Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derivatives of position

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected to Kinematics, because any content that's not already in that article is, at best, OR with definite CoI.. DS 14:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Derivatives of position

95% of this article is a hoax and the 5% of real physics it contains can already be found at Kinematics. It appears the author had way to much time to lose... Tomj 23:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Whether or not the information contained within is accurate or not, this article is a blatant violation of WP:OR. The References section is dominated by articles written by a Steve Mann. Checking author Glogger's page, he signs his paragraph "Steve." Hmm... Following a link to his personal website we find he is, in fact, Steve Mann. While I rather like the information contained in this article, I think it needs a lot of work to remove the OR. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JFlav (talk • contribs) 01:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. I think it's clear that the author had a conflict of interest. Having studied physics on a college level, I know enough to say that most of the article is nonsense, and the fraction of worthwhile material is probably covered elsewhere in Wikipedia. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 13:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.