Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Rhodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 19:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Derek Rhodes

Derek Rhodes (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested Prod. No sources cited for notability claims. No evidence independent of subject or of Wikipedia article found. Subject does not satisfy WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC. • Gene93k 06:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete No reliable, third party sources. The one external link is to a myspace page, and after going there... I'm not convinced that this isn't a copyvio.James Sugrono_{Contributions} 07:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Comment This page has been deleted three times before. Does it meet CSD G4? James-Sugrono_{Contributions} 01:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable, no third party sources. A copyvio can be ruled out as it appears the subject wrote the article, making this a vanity page as well.--Sethacus 23:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, copyvio isn't an issue IF and only if he is the copyright holder of the songs - which I can't see being verified any time soon, as artists don't tend to acknowledge background vocals. Even if copyvio isn't an issue, this page doesn't quite pass verifiability standards.James Sugrono_{Contributions} 00:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Agree no Third Party sources, not verifiable. I have personal evidence too, not that that matters much on wikipedia. Also this is not the first time Mr. Rhodes has done this, and had his article deleted so, delete. Unterdenlinden 00:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)I know Derek Rhodes, and this is just about all made up

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.