Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Lodge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Daniel 09:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Derek Lodge

Derek Lodge (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not meet WP:Notability BlackJack | talk page 20:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment. You might want to state which part of WP:NOT it violates. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment "vice-chairman (1992-1996) of the Cricket Society .. edited the successful "ACS Famous Cricketers" seriesDGG (talk) 00:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
    Correction. Apologies, I thought WP:NOT was shorthand for WP:Notability. The Cricket Society itself is marginally notable because of its charitable status; individual members are not notable per se unless their activities outside the society meet the criteria. --BlackJack | talk page 08:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, This one is easier to vote for then the other Cricket entries. As I have stated in other responces Cricket is big in England, do lots of charity work, and this guy has an annual award named after him. Callelinea 17:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete; I agree with Jack that officers of the Cricket Society are not thereby notable. Stephen Turner (Talk) 07:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - his publications may be enough to make him notable. A Bibliography section would strengthen the article. JH (talk page) 09:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Which of these is the claim to notability? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.