Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Alan Walker

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 03:11, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Derek Alan Walker

He became a famous businessman in only two years. Then why haven't I heard of him? Why hasn't Google heard of his company? Why can't we speedy stuff like this?--Xcali 06:14, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete patent vanity, should be able to be speedied. --FCYTravis 07:22, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy, blatant and shameless vanity, apparently also exaggerating and/or lying about his own feats. Jamyskis 07:39, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Because two editors is not enough. As Jamyskis says, this appears to be exaggeration or falsehood. No cited sources. WP:BIO criteria not met. Delete. Uncle G 12:21, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
• Delete: It's vanity, of course, but I also think that "vanity" is the one charge where VfD nominators (and voters) are most likely to make a mistake. Consequently, "vanity" isn't a speedy. At the same time, I fully share everyone's frustration. Geogre 12:29, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Vanity isn't a reason for speedying, but patent nonsense is, and there is absolutely zilch proof that much of this article is correct. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs, Me 23:33, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity, vanity, vanity. --Etacar11 23:22, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 06:41, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.