Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deranged (wrestler)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 23:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deranged (wrestler)

Deranged (wrestler) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. Non notable independent wrestler, fails WP:BIO and WP:A. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 01:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom , fails WP:BIO & WP:A. --Paloma Walker 02:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: Googling (Deranged CZW) turns up 2,140 hits - why does/doesn't this satisfy WP:BIO? Emurphy42 10:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Emurphy, the primary notability criterion states that "A notable topic should be the subject of multiple non-trivial published works". A Train^talk 17:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Not to mention that the Google term above actually only returns 210 unique hits, and most of those are blogs, forums, or irrelevant. EliminatorJR ^Talk 18:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable wrestler. Wooyi^{Talk, Editor review} 17:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I've enjoyed Deranged's work but I don't think he meets any of the General criteria of WP:BIO. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 14:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Bmg916^Speak_Sign 19:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 20:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.