Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis and Judi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per consensus.. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dennis and Judi

Dennis and Judi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Unreferenced, non notable local radio show. Rtphokie (talk) 00:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete no evidence of notability. JJL (talk) 01:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable; broadcast on only one station. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 04:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment They're actually on multiple repeaters so their show can be heard over the entire state. It's more significant than say a local radio personality in my mid-size city in NY, but even some of them are very widely referenced in local news media. Kevin Smith (talk) 23:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Claims to be highest rated radio show in New Jersey and to cover the entire state, a significant geographical region. Article needs rewriting, sourcing, and cruft removal to be acceptable but that's not the purpose of an AfD. - Dravecky (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment Thanks for pointing out that claim, that paragraph is a fine mix of unsupportd claims and original research that needs to be substantiated with some good sources.--Rtphokie (talk) 20:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment That's about the radio station that the show is broadcast on, not the show itself. It would need to be demonstrated that the show is significant in the station's lineup. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 20:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

• delete, I've heard them every day and they're not notable at all outside of their very limited listener base on 101.5. fethers (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep isn't up to Wikipedia quality standards but I think they're notable enough (substantial and large listener base) to be included here. Needs significant work. There's some 1,860 Google search results for their name, including news articles and press releases. I think we've met the notability guidelines with this article. Kevin Smith (talk) 23:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.