Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Tedlock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep; withdrawn by nominator. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dennis Tedlock
No sourcing, not complying to WP:BLP and suspicious edit by the original creator seems to indicate this is a WP:HOAX (Note that the name of the articles subject changed, but nothing else) Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 09:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: not a hoax, see e.g. [1], [2], [3]. Not sure yet whether he's sufficiently notable, per WP:PROF. Scog (talk) 10:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Named professorship at a large state university, two significant awards, adds up to a multiple pass of WP:PROF#6. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. A named chair professorship at a good university and the awards listed in the article make the case. Also significant results in GoogleScholar[4], including the highly cited book with 237 citations. Clearly satisfies WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 16:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, per Nsk92 and David Eppstein. MrPrada (talk) 17:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Par changes to the article. The sudden name change of the subject made this article feel like a hoax, but it is clear that this is not the case now. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 19:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
