Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denim Revolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 21:25, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Denim Revolution

del nonnotable yet neologism, unlike denim revolution, unrelated to Belarus. mikka (t) 03:48, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

• delete A multi-year search of an international news database shows that only one November 2005 article in The Economist magazine uses this phrase. The use of Denim as a symbol in Belarussian politics dates from September 2005 - this fact could be moved to the Belarus wikipedia page for the politics page. But this little known neologism should be deleted for now Bwithh 04:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to A Day of Solidarity with Belarus.
• delete original research --Ghirlandajo 09:17, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - [1], [2], [3]. Valid term used for topical story. Zordrac 19:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
  • The first of your links is to "premium content" that I can't view. The second is to a page that contains no mention of the word "denim" that I can find. The third is to a blog discussing current events in Canada, while the article is about Belarus. I have to say I remain unconvinced that this is not a neologism. — Haeleth Talk 22:46, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Searching Google for "Denim Revolution" + Delarus gets 29 hits, all but one on economist.com (and that last one is an accidental conjunction of article titles). Definitely non-notable outside of the pages of the Economist. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 22:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete - the Economist is a legitimate source, and its coinages can reasonably be expected to gain currency (no pun intended), but I see no evidence that this has happened yet. Perhaps the information should be merged as Bwithh suggests. — Haeleth Talk 22:46, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.