Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demonic car concept

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 00:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Demonic car concept

Demonic car concept (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Clear WP:NOR - article is trying to create a new definition of a "concept" used in films. A concept which isn't notable enough to write an article about - Googling "Demonic car concept" gives zero results (not including copies of this article). Apart from that, the notable vehicles and films are already listed in Phantom vehicle. Saikokira 00:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom, original research and the important information's already in the other article. -- Mithent 01:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - per nom, fails WP:NOR.--Bryson{Talk}{Edits} 02:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as WP:OR - there may be plenty of demon cars, and associated articles, but there are no sources on the concept of demon cars - Tiswas(t/c) 10:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - it's not even an article on the concept of demon cars. It's just listcruft OR - Tiswas(t/c) 13:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - same explanation as Tiswas: this is OR. Nihiltres 14:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - unsourced, and is really a list of movies. -- Whpq 15:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Good example of what a article should not be.--St.daniel talk 17:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Original research. Realkyhick 18:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOR violations. Acalamari 20:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Lemonsawdust 21:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. ffm ✎talk 13:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge into Phantom vehicle. // Liftarn
  • Delete - original research. Metamagician3000 13:59, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.