The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant 02:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Keep It's been around for almost 100 years, it's spread to several schools, it needs to be expanded and sourced not deleted. ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 20:59, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Not terribly interesting, but I can't argue against the points that ONUnicorn made. I added some external links. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.