Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Della Crews
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 21:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Della Crews
The article lacks information, it lacks a defined layout. The article offers nothing. Articles about television news anchors in local markets do not automatically warrant a page. Write_On_1983 talk | contribs 19:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Yeah, I know it goes against what I just said above, but being the article is paragraph total, it's gotta go. Unless someone can re-write the thing so that it will standup to the notability, etc. - SVRTVDude (VT) 20:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete it seems as only KDKA's people have wiki pages. Strong Delete, per nom --TREYWiki 21:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Say What? Where do you get KDKA from this one? There seems to be a distinct cut-and-paste feel to your comments, as every newsperson AfD you commented on was with the exact same statement. And at no point do you give a true reason why the article in question should be deleted. DarkAudit 03:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Say What? Got that right, on the other hand it was nominated for bogus deletion reasons also. I think we're being played by a group of kids having fun on Wikipedia. KP Botany 18:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Say What? Where do you get KDKA from this one? There seems to be a distinct cut-and-paste feel to your comments, as every newsperson AfD you commented on was with the exact same statement. And at no point do you give a true reason why the article in question should be deleted. DarkAudit 03:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Nominator failed to use Wikipedia process for AfD. Almost all articles on Wikipedia lack some information, that is not a reason for deleting all of Wikipedia. Poor layout requires tagging or fixing, not deletion. It doesn't matter whether other articles about television news anchors in local markets warrant a page or not, that's a policy consideration, discuss that with the community. What matters is if this article is about someone sufficiently notable to merit a page.
- And please don't use AfD to prod for improvement of an article, simply layout the article better if it needs that, or post a wikification tag. Please read and respect the box at the top of WP:AfD:
-
- Before listing an article for deletion here, consider whether a more efficient alternative is appropriate:
- For problems that do not require deletion, including duplicate articles, articles needing improvement, pages needing redirects, or POV problems, be bold and fix the problem or tag the article appropriately.
- KP Botany 00:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Local news anchor, a couple of bit-parts in TV movies? plus article is completely unsourced. As it stands, fails WP:BIO and WP:N. EliminatorJR Talk 21:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
