Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delegation marketing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The result was Delete --JForget 02:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Delegation marketing

Delegation marketing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Also included in this nom:

These three articles appear to be part of some scheme to promote the authors' services. See [1] [2] Toohool (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete All appear to be neologisms and specifically created by the company in question to promote specific services. No evidence the term is used beyond those by the company who created it. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all. Neologismsthat appear to be non-notable. Plus, Rbjewell has removed an {{unsourced}} tag from one of these articles without addressing the issue. The notability of these terms is not asserted, and there are unreferenced claims of these methods being successful, which beg the question, where? --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 10:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, quite strongly; concur with all above. These articles are full of vacuous word salad:
    Marketing has many interpretations, and depending on which text book you read, you will get conflicting definitions. The term marketing is very misunderstood with the common thought of sales. Behind marketing is a complex system that directs strategies and processes in the delivery of products to the point of sale.
    — essentially meaningless or tautological complete bollocks. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete First ghit you view, describes it as a Neo. Call Speedy. scope_creep (talk) 18:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per all of the above. Additionally, the meta-reference to Wikipedia seems important but unsalvagable. \sim Lenoxus " * " 01:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.